- Mac os 8.6 mpw download software#
- Mac os 8.6 mpw download plus#
- Mac os 8.6 mpw download mac#
- Mac os 8.6 mpw download windows#
I did the AppleTalk stack integration in 1985 and for the dev machines it was just rolled into the office network.
Mac os 8.6 mpw download mac#
The seamless networking integration on the Lisa Mac end had pretty much caught up by that stage.
Mac os 8.6 mpw download software#
The Lisa by 1983 did pretty much all the software stuff the Star did and in a much more integrated and coherent manner. In many ways the Sun 3 and Apollo Domain workstations were much more interesting machines at the time. The Star was interesting to use from an historical perspective but that was about it. So thats what I was comparing the Star against. I also had an early alpha of Apples port of SmallTalk 80 running on one of the Macs at the time.
Mac os 8.6 mpw download plus#
We had a $100K plus Symbolics 3600 and a whole office of Lisas / Macs doing dev work. It was acquired as the result of a failed project. I think the setup he had would have cost about $35K if bought at the time it was shipped a few years before. The only time I got any time on a Xerox Star would have been in 1985. The only really commercial machine was the Star. Now the Alto truly was revolutionary in the mid 1970's but a much more primitive machine. Not sure that the Xerox Star was all that great.quickly obsoleted As a developer, it was of course, terrible to program for. 3.1 was a massive leap and, for me at least, the peak-windows experience.
Mac os 8.6 mpw download windows#
Modern Excel and Word read those outputs from the 80's perfectly.īy comparison, Windows 1 and 2 were nothing more than forgettable toys. Create a spreadsheet or word processor file and transfer it over to a modern PC. Unproductive, obtuse DOS-derived systems or a nice, fast and responsive GUI? NASA knew what a good thing the 2000 was even the space shuttle telemetry labs used them right into the 2000's long after they had any right to still be in service.įor compatibility - and comedy value - try installing the Works today under UAE. In my opinion, the business world plopped for IBM and clones frankly, because they were not especially informed buyers. Wordworth a few years later gave the miggy a very potent word processor option too, though did really need an accelerator and a bit of extra memory over the vanilla 68000. Compatible with most of major file formats of the day, I do believe the Works could read Lotus 123. A2000, deluxe paint, the Works! platinum edition both brilliant programs. I'd have taken the Amiga a thousand times over the alternatives - and indeed did. (XCode certainly doesn't help there though - it is a gargantuan sack of shit of monumental proportions.) I used to love using a Mac at work back in the mid 90s. It's little things like that that show how shit macOSX is compared to earlier versions. Therefore the V should (usually) be orientated to allow more downward movement than upward movement. Most sub menus open with their tops flush to the parent item they belong to and extend downwards. I think the actual orientation of the V region should be dependent on the position of the sub menu. That's better, but not quite perfect if you ask me. As long as the mouse pointer remained in that region (until reaching the sub menu) the sub menu would remain open. Originally, macOS defined a V shaped region (rotated 90 degrees, obvs.) with its point located slightly on the other side of where the mouse cursor was when the sub menu was displayed. It looks like macOSX has implemented a similar delay. Newer UI elements like the breadcrumb drop down menus in Windows Explorer have no delay at all because morons.
Windows has always had a delay between moving the pointer out of the highlighted menu item and the sub menu closing, so if you're fast enough you'll make it to the sub menu even if you clip the corner. Which is why Win16/Win32 was always complete incoherent. The best description of Win 3 I ever saw was - MS read Inside Mac very carefully from cover to cover copying what the saw but completely and totally missed the point. It took MS another 5 years to even start ripping of the Mac in a half assed way, Win 3.0 and over a decade before they got anything usable. A year after the Mac made it completely obsolete. Win 1 was demo-ed in 1983 as ready to ship "real soon now" but only shipped anything stable in 1985. Whereas Windows 1 was a straight rip-off from Visi On. That's where the Lisa desktop and applications actually came from. People at PARC like Larry Tesler jumped at the opportunity and went to work at Apple to turn this into reality. So Jobs was invited to a demo in 1979 of what the guys at PARC had and offered them a chance to turn it into a mass market technology. A $100K plus kinda workstation with no serious marketing effort behind it is not exactly a serious effort. Xerox refused to invest any serious resources in commercializing what PARC had invented.
0 kommentar(er)
